Friday, June 6, 2014

GM car defects may have led to dozens more deaths, report suggests

Prepared for some more vehicle news? We have an excellent short article today that you need to really read. Stay up to date with all automobile related details and auto transport news right here.



At least 74 people have died in General Motors cars in accidents with some key similarities to those that GM has linked to 13 deaths involving defective ignition switches, a Reuters analysis of government fatal-crash data has determined. Such accidents also occurred at a higher rate in the GM cars than in top competitors' models, the analysis showed.

Reuters searched the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS), a national database of crash information submitted by local law-enforcement agencies, for single-car frontal collisions where no front air bags deployed and the driver or front-seat passenger was killed.

The news agency compared the incidence of this kind of deadly accident in the Chevrolet Cobalt and the Saturn Ion, the highest-profile cars in GM's recall of 2.6 million cars with defective switches, against the records of three popular small-car competitors: Ford Focus, Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla. The analysis found that the frequency of such accidents in the Ion was nearly six times that of the Corolla and twice that of the Focus. The Ion had 5.9 such fatal crashes per 100,000 cars sold, followed by the Cobalt, with 4.1, the Ford Focus with 2.9, the Civic with 1.6, and the Corolla with 1.0.

It is not clear how many of the deadly accidents identified by Reuters involved defective ignition switches, because crash reports typically do not include that data. That leaves open the possibility that air bags may have failed to deploy in some of the GM crashes for reasons other than faulty switches.

GM, which has offered few details of the fatal crashes related to faulty switches, told Reuters it derived the tally of 13 deaths from claims and lawsuits filed against the automaker. GM checked those claims and lawsuits against other sources available to it, including vehicle data recorders recovered from some crashes.

The Reuters analysis relied on the FARS database, which encompasses a much wider universe of accidents. GM declined to say whether it had used information from the federal database.

Reuters disclosed its findings in detail to GM and federal regulators at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). GM declined to comment on Reuters' findings or methodology, responding only that: "Our focus is on doing the right thing for customers - fixing the recalled vehicles as quickly as possible, addressing our civic and legal responsibilities and setting a new industry standard for safety."

NHTSA Acting Administrator David Friedman told Reuters: "The final death toll associated with this safety defect is not known to NHTSA, but we believe it's likely that more than 13 lives were lost."

Toyota and Honda declined to comment. Ford said it took issue with the Reuters findings concerning the Focus, but didn't specify its reasons.

GM engineers first encountered problems with the switches in 2001, a year before the first Ion went into production. The faulty GM ignition switches could cause engines to shut off while driving, leading to a sudden loss of power steering and power brakes, and the failure of air bags to deploy in a crash.

Managers subsequently considered, then rejected several proposals to repair or replace the switches because of the extra cost, GM told NHTSA and congressional investigators. The automaker did not begin recalling the cars until February 2014, after a two-and-a-half-year internal investigation. Eventually, GM recalled every Ion and Cobalt built from model years 2003 to 2010. Reuters used those model years for its analysis.

Using the FARS database of crashes reported to U.S. safety regulators between 2003 and 2012, Reuters identified 45 front-seat fatalities in the Cobalt and 29 in the Ion. In similar crashes, there were 44 fatalities in the Ford Focus, 41 in the Honda Civic and 24 in the Toyota Corolla.

Reuters found the Focus had 43 fatal accidents, the Cobalt had 42, the Civic had 39, the Ion had 28 and the Corolla had 24. While the raw crash numbers appear comparable, the rate of deadly crashes was higher in the two GM models, as the Ford, Honda and Toyota models sold in substantially greater numbers.

The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, a non-profit safety research group connected with the U.S. insurance industry, reviewed the Reuters analysis. David Zuby, executive vice president and chief research officer, said: "Your crash rates suggest that Cobalt and Ion are less crashworthy than the other models for which you've computed similar statistics," and are similar to those in a 2011 IIHS analysis.

Zuby added that there were several limitations to the analysis, noting that "while your analysis does focus on circumstances that are similar to the cases involving GM air bags that failed to deploy because of the ignition switch problem, it cannot be said definitively that the ignition switch problem" caused 74 deaths.

It is possible, Zuby said, that limitations in the data examined by Reuters may overstate the number of deaths attributable to air bag non-deployment in the car models examined.

Those limitations include the fact that there are other reasons why air bags may not deploy in a frontal crash, such as a car sliding under a truck. Air bag defects unrelated to the ignition switch could cause a failure to deploy, he said, and air bags are designed not to deploy in some situations, such as where the passenger is a child. Zuby also noted that an Insurance Institute study showed the FARS database overstated the problem of air bag non-deployments.

That means the number of fatalities from the Reuters analysis is probably inflated, he said. However, the problems would not affect one model more than another, he added.

At the same time, there are other ways in which the Reuters tally may undercount switch-related fatalities in the GM models. The FARS crash data runs only through 2012, and Reuters did not include two fatalities of backseat passengers.

The fatalities entered in the FARS database and reviewed by Reuters do not include at least five of the 13 deaths acknowledged by GM. One died in 2013, past the range of the current FARS data, and two died in a multi-car accident.

Another, Amber Marie Rose, was killed in the July 2005 single-car crash of her 2005 Cobalt in Maryland. GM has confirmed that Rose is among the 13 victims, and investigators hired by NHTSA said her air bag did not deploy. But the FARS data indicates that the air bag did deploy and her death isn't included in the Reuters count.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/jun/03/gm-car-defects-deaths-faults

Cobalt Offers Car Shipping To Alabama





Some more good car shipping information - if you're trying to get your vehicle to or from Alabama then check out Cobalt and watch this video.

For the full video, visit: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmksnakKnUA

Getting your car, truck, or motorcycle shipped to or from the state of Alabama doesn't have to be difficult. Let Cobalt Auto Transport Services provide you with quick vehicle shipping and great customer service. Call us toll free at 855-242-8090 or visit us online at http://cobaltautoservices.com/us-transport/alabama-auto-transport/.

Whether you are heading to Birmingham, Huntsville, Montgomery, Tuscaloosa, or anywhere else in Alabama, Cobalt can help you get your vehicle shipped quickly and safely.

Our years of experience mean that you can deal with a company that will give you a customized quote that takes into account the dates that you need your car shipped and the best route in order to give you the best price we can.

Interested finding out more about Alabama before your move or relocation? Visit the website via the link above for valuable resources to help - whether it's maps of the highways or finding a place to live, you can find what you need.

Also, if you are looking for car shipping tips, be sure to check visit our site. We have written resources and tips, videos, and more to help you be as informed as possible prior to getting your car transported.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pmksnakKnUA

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Within GM, a clash of cultures

All set for some more automotive news? We have an excellent post today that you should actually review. Stay up to this day with all automobile related details and automobile transport information right here.

Safety, cost-containment and impenetrable decision-making

Safety, cost-containment and impenetrable decision-making



"We cannot conclude," the Valukas report reads, "that the atmosphere of cost-cutting had no impact on the failure of GM to resolve these issues earlier."

Photo credit: BLOOMBERG

PRIMER

Related Links

Related Stories

Related Topics

DETROIT -- Page 248 of Anton Valukas' report on what went wrong with General Motors' deadly ignition switch defect outlines how GM's safety efforts run smack into its cost-conscious culture.

Under the heading "Tone at the Top," the report tries to peg how much GM's culture -- in full-blown cost-cutting mode at the time the bad switches were installed in Chevrolet Cobalts and other small cars -- had to do with its handling of the defect.



The report, which relied in part on interviews of 230 employees, describes a troubling mixed message subtly conveyed by senior leadership: that safety is paramount, yet so is keeping a lid on costs.

"Repeated throughout the interview process we heard from GM personnel two somewhat different directives," the report reads. "When safety is an issue, cost is irrelevant" and "cost is everything."

The report provides a harsh rebuke of GM's infamous committee culture, too, one that on the ignition-switch issue rendered "determining the identity of an actual decision maker … impenetrable."

Some GM employees told investigators that they didn't take any notes during "critical safety meetings" because they didn't think lawyers wanted them to.

Investigators never found evidence of an edict banning note-taking. But "the no-notes direction … reached the status of an urban myth that was followed, an instruction passed from GM employee to GM employee over the years," the report reads.

One of the most colorful descriptions of the cultural morass came from CEO Mary Barra herself. She described for investigators a phenomenon known as the "GM nod."

"The GM nod, Barra described, is when everyone nods in agreement to a proposed plan of action, but then leaves the room with no intention of follow through," the report reads. "It is an idiomatic recognition of a culture that does not move issues forward quickly, as the story of the Cobalt demonstrates."

There was also the "GM salute," described by another interviewee as "a crossing of the arms and pointing outward toward others, indicating that the responsibility belongs to someone else, not me."

Ultimately, Valukas' report says it uncovered no evidence of any employee making "an explicit trade-off between safety and cost" related to the ignition switch. It notes that, because engineers early on failed to grasp a link between the ignition switch slipping out of the "run" position and airbags not deploying, the problem was treated as a customer-satisfaction issue, not a safety problem.

Still, "we cannot conclude," the report reads, "that the atmosphere of cost-cutting had no impact on the failure of GM to resolve these issues earlier."

You can reach Mike Colias at mcolias@crain.com.

http://www.autonews.com/article/20140605/OEM11/140609883/within-gm-a-clash-of-cultures

Wednesday, June 4, 2014

US auto workers face first hike in union dues since 1967

Prepared for some more vehicle information? We have a good short article today that you should actually read. Stay up to date with all car related information and auto transport news right here.

The United Auto Workers union raised its membership dues for the first time since 1967 on Tuesday, hiking them 25% to replenish a depleted fund to support workers who go out on strike.



Union members will pay dues equal to two-and-a-half hours of regular monthly pay, up from two hours a month.

In a rare divisive debate at the UAW convention, where most resolutions are passed by near-unanimity, 20 delegates spoke for and 20 against the measure.

After a voice vote was declared by UAW president Bob King to be too close to call, a show of hands in the downtown Detroit convention hall showed support for the union. It appeared that nearly a third voted against the dues increase.

Tuesday's vote came as the auto industry reported an annual US sales rate in May that was the strongest since before the 2008 recession. Nearly half of the UAW's 400,000 members are in the automotive industry, including workers at the largest three US-based automakers.



A veteran UAW-represented worker at either General Motors Co, Ford Motor Co, or Fiat Chrysler Automobiles making about $28 per hour will pay union dues of about $70.32 per month, up from about $56 currently. A recently hired worker making $15.78 per hour will pay $39.45 per month, up from the current $31.56.

King, whose four-year term as head of the union ends later this week, campaigned for the dues increase for more than six months. He said the hike was needed because the union's strike fund had shrunk to around $600m from more than $1bn a decade ago.

The UAW says the dues increase will raise about $49m a year.

Gary Walkowicz, from a Ford plant in Dearborn, Michigan, called for the vote to be forestalled to allow to allow a referendum of the union's full membership. But King said one of the reasons a full referendum was not being held was that anti-UAW "outside influences" would affect the vote.

While the UAW's membership has increased 10% during King's four-year term, it is down 40% from about 655,000 a decade ago. The union had nearly 1.5 million members at its peak in 1979.

Dennis Williams, the UAW's secretary-treasurer, is expected to be voted in as the union's new president by delegates at the convention on Wednesday. He is opposed by Walkowicz, who is not expected to get much support.

The dues increase goes into effect in August.

"A strong strike fund is the best defense against being run over by the companies," said Bill Lucas, who works at an auto parts distribution plant in Ohio, echoing a view shared by many delegates.

But others, like Edd McNulty, from a GM plant in Ohio, said delegates were voting against the majority of the UAW's membership.

"The leadership [of the UAW] has lost touch with the people who work on the shop floor," said McNulty.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jun/03/us-auto-workers-uaw-union-dues-increase

Tuesday, June 3, 2014

Ford edges Chrysler for top spot in May sales in Canada

Ready for some even more automotive news? We have a good post today that you need to really read. Stay up to date with all automobile related details and auto transportation information here.

Related Stories

Related Topics

June 3, 2014 - 3:00 pm ET

TORONTO (Reuters) -- Ford edged out Chrysler for the top spot in May vehicle sales in Canada by 256 units. But for the year to date, Chrysler holds a lead of 7,314 vehicles over Ford in Canada. 

Ford of Canada said it sold 31,754 vehicles in May while Chrysler Group said it delivered 31,498 units during the month. Ford's results were down 2.3 percent from the same month last year while Chrysler posted an 8 percent gain.

Truck sales for Ford grew by 1.1 percent to 23,802 vehicles, but car sales slipped 11.2 percent to 7,952 vehicles, the company said. So far this year, total sales have dropped 4.8 percent to 112,265 Ford-branded vehicles.

The company set May sales records for its Escape small SUV and F-150 truck, and recorded its best ever monthly sales for the Explorer SUV. 

Chrysler Canada said it set all-time monthly sales records for its Ram and Jeep brands and a May sales record for its Canadian-built Dodge Grand Caravan.

The monthly sales maintain Chrysler Canada's position as the country's top-selling automotive company for 2014, it said, with total year-to-date sales up 6 percent at 119,579 vehicles.

General Motors said its sales in Canada grew 12 percent to 26,444 vehicles in May. It was GM's best May since 2009 and its best total sales since June 2011, the company said. Retail sales rose 16 percent.

GM also said it is offering an employee pricing program in Canada "to customers on virtually all of its Chevrolet, Buick and GMC vehicles."



U.S. auto sales rose 11 percent to 1.6 million light vehicles, resulting in an annualized selling rate of 16.8 million units -- the highest since July 2006.

Philip Nussel of Automotive News contributed to this report.

Contact Automotive News

http://www.autonews.com/article/20140603/RETAIL01/140609952/ford-edges-chrysler-for-top-spot-in-may-sales-in-canada

Monday, June 2, 2014

British car manufacturing accelerates sharply in April

Ready for some even more vehicle information? We have a great article today that you need to actually check out. Stay up to date with all automobile related info and auto transport information here.

An Aston Martin Vanquish being inspected by hand

An Aston Martin Vanquish is inspected: the company plans to invest £20m in extending its headquarters and production plant in Gaydon, Warwickshire. Photograph: Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

British car manufacturing sharply accelerated in April, with the number of cars made in the UK up by a fifth.



A total of 133,437 cars were built in UK factories last month, a 21.3% increase compared with April last year and the biggest monthly rise since July 2012 according to the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Traders.

It followed a 12% rise in March, and Mike Hawes, the SMMT's chief executive, said UK factories were beginning to feel the benefit of new models rolling of the production line as well as recovering demand in Europe.

"The thriving nature of the UK car manufacturing industry was evident in April as output grew at its highest rate for almost two years. New model introductions are fuelling growth, while Europe â€" which currently accounts for around half of exports â€" is now seeing an upturn in demand.

"As investments continue to be realised, we expect further rises in the coming months; good news for the thousands of suppliers and employees across the country that rely on this industry."

The figures were published as Aston Martin, the luxury British sports car manufacturer favoured by James Bond, announced plans to invest £20m to extend its factory and global headquarters in Gaydon, Warwickshire. Around 250 new jobs will be created in engineering, manufacturing and commercial roles over the next few months, the company said. The investment is part of a five-year plan to spend more than £500m on developing new models.

Aston Martin also revealed it has received more than 500 applications for just 12 places on its latest apprenticeship round. It will also hire 14 new graduates in 2014.



Almost 80% of the cars made in Britain last month were built for export, a welcome statistic for George Osborne who is hoping the UK economy will develop a greater reliance on manufacturing and exports and a lesser reliance on debt fueled spending and financial services.

Over the first four months of 2014, British factories built 538,240 cars, a 6.9% increase compared with the same period last year.

http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/may/29/uk-car-manufacturing-accelerates-april

Sunday, June 1, 2014

Google's self-driving car: How does it work and when can we drive one?

Ready for some more vehicle news? We have an excellent post today that you need to actually read. Stay up to date with all car related info and car transport information here.

Google unveiled a brand new self-driving car prototype on Tuesday; the first company to build a car with no a steering wheel, accelerator or brake pedal.

The car's arrival marks the next stage in Google’s self-driving car project, which was born from the Darpa Grand Challenges for robotic vehicles in the early 2000s. Google kickstarted its own self-driving car project in 2008, and it has been rumbling on ever since, first with modified Toyota Prius and then with customised Lexus SUVs, which took the car’s existing sensors, such as the cruise-control cameras, and added a spinning laser scanner on the top.

What is it?

Google's self-driving carGoogle's self-driving car taking a spin around a car park Photograph: Google

It is the first truly driverless electric car prototype built by Google to test the next stage of its five-year-old self-driving car project. It looks like a cross between a Smart car and a Nissan Micra, with two seats and room enough for a small amount of luggage.



It is the first real physical incarnation of Google’s vision of what a self-driving car of the near future could be.

Where is it?

It operates in and around California, primarily around the Mountain View area where Google has its headquarters.

What does it do?

It ferries two people from one place to another without any user interaction. The car is summoned by a smartphone for pick up at the user’s location with the destination set. There is no steering wheel or manual control, simply a start button and a big red emergency stop button. In front of the passengers there is a small screen showing the weather, the current speed and a small countdown animation to launch.

Once the journey is done, the small screen displays a message to remind you to take your personal belongings â€" reinforcing that this is not aiming to be a substitute for your personal car at the moment, but more as a replacement for the taxi without the human driver.

What’s it like?

Google's self-driving carThe go button right next to the big red emergency stop button, just in case. Photograph: Google

Very few people outside of Google have been allowed to ride in the new car. Most of the people depicted in Google’s promotional videos for the new car described the experience as “smooth” and “nothing that feels the least bit threatening”.

Kara Swisher and Liz Gannes from technology site Recode were one of the few independent test riders, who described the car as having “ample” room despite being small, likely due to the lack of the normal controls taking up space in the cabin, and "that this felt a lot like a theme park ride".

Who built it?

Google has designed the car from scratch, starting with the sensors and a frame to interconnect them, then adding a cabin that does not block any of the sensors or create blind spots and eventually the body shell. The manufacturing of the 100 or so prototype cars will be done by a firm in the Detroit area, but Google declined to comment on which.

How does it work?

Powered by an electric motor with around a 100 mile range, the car uses a combination of sensors and software to locate itself in the real world combined with highly accurate digital maps. A GPS is used, just like the satellite navigation systems in most cars, to get a rough location of the car, at which point radar, lasers and cameras take over to monitor the world around the car, 360-degrees.

The software can recognise objects, people, cars, road marking, signs and traffic lights, obeying the rules of the road and allowing for multiple unpredictable hazards, including cyclists. It can even detect road works and safely navigate around them.

Google's self-driving carGoogle's self-driving car being built in Detroit. Photograph: Google

The new prototype has more sensors fitted to it that can see further (up to 600 feet in all directions) and in greater detail than the ones available on the previous repurposed Lexus and Toyota vehicles.

How safe is it?

The new car is the next evolution of Google’s self-driving car. While the new frame is untested, the company’s previous versions have clocked up over 700,000 miles of testing on public roads, mainly around California, including over 1,000 miles of driving in the most complex situations and cities like San Francisco’s hills and busy streets.

The car itself is limited to 25 mph, which restricts it to certain roads, but also minimises the kinetic energy it could carry into a crash if one should happen. The front of the car is also made to be as kind to pedestrians as possible with a foam bumper and a flexible windscreen that is designed to absorb energy from an impact with a person’s body.

Seat belts are also provided â€" a safety requirement for vehicles on the road â€" while the car has redundant systems, a “fault-tolerant architecture” as Google calls it, for both steering and braking, should the primary systems fails; plus that emergency stop button that passengers can hit at any time.

Google has also taken the data and behaviours it learned from its previous vehicles to create a defensive, considerate driving style that is meant to protect both the passengers and other road users. For instance, the car will wait a second after the traffic lights turn green before it moves off, although this could incur the anger of drivers stuck behind it.

Google also says that making it drive in a natural and predictable way has been one of the key goals, so that it behaves in a familiar way on the road for other drivers.

Google's self-driving carA laser sensor on the roof constantly scans the surroundings. Photograph: GoogleWhy now?

Google says it has gone as far as it can with the current customised vehicles and that a new platform is needed to take the project and technology to the next step and closer to a product people can actually use.

For instance, the previous generation Lexus vehicle had blind spots right up against the car where the sensors couldn’t see, something that needs to be eliminated in any vehicle open to the public.

The cars will first be used to test the software driving the car and push its capabilities. Google says at some point, when it deems its software safe, it will start putting real people into the cars beyond Google engineers. It will use the cars in a similar manner to the company’s Google Glass explorer programme, analysing how people use them and what works and what doesn’t.

Why do damn cute?

The car’s cute looks and friendly “face” were created intentionally to be “very Googley” according to its designers, to put both other road users and passengers at ease with the new technology. The shell is also designed to give the sensors the best view of the surroundings.

Why does it still look like a car on the inside?

The new car has two traditional car seats, primarily because in this iteration passengers have to be strapped in like they would in any other car to meet safety regulations, which means using standard seat belts. It also provides a more familiar passenger experience, which at this stage is likely important to aid adoption.

Is this something I’m going to be able to buy?

Google’s vision for this kind of self-driving car isn’t an exact replacement for the one parked outside your home. They are designed to be more like shared vehicles, possibly within a family or more likely as a replacement for taxis.

Google's self-driving carThe front of the car is designed to absorb as much of the impact as possible with a pedestrian, if one ever happens. Photograph: Google

These cars are still very much in the early prototype stage still, and Google is still trying to figure out how to make a product out of the technology, how much it is likely to cost and when it will be available.

Apparently it will not have ads according to Google, although whether it’ll eventually have a small screen like some taxis now that plays video adverts, who knows. That will likely be up to the operator rather than Google.

Who will build it for me?

Google is proving the technology, but it is unlikely to make the cars for sale once that technology is ready for the mass market. It has said in the past that it is actively seeking car manufacturing partners, which means we could see a Toyota, Ford or Fiat-made Google car in the future, but that is all very much still up in the air.

When can I get one?

Google says the cars should be road-ready by early next year, but that testing would take more than two years. At that point the technology will be ready for the next stage, which is likely to be greater pilot testing.

Current expectations are that these self-driving cars are at least five years away from being mature enough to create a real, non-prototype product, but it may be far longer until you can buy or hire one for personal use.

What about legislation?

One of the biggest hold-ups to the progression of the technology onto the open road of Britain, the US, Australia and the rest of the world will be legislation.

A law was passed in California over a year ago that made the testing and operation of self-driving vehicles on roads possible, as long as they had manual override controls. The Department of Motor Vehicles in California is expected to issue regulations on the operation of self-driving cars soon, after which self-driving cars may become a bit more common place.

However, there is still much to work out, primarily revolving around what a passenger in a self-driving car and can’t do â€" will they have to be able to take control at any moment, for instance â€" as well as questions around what happens when an accident happens, who is at fault and who pays.

• Google's driverless car: no steering wheel, two seats, 25mph

• Analysis: a long and winding road to success for Google's self-driving car

http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/may/28/google-self-driving-car-how-does-it-work